Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ringenberg Examples-as-Help"
(→Interactive Communication Cluster: Wiki Page Reviews and Discussion) |
m (→Interactive Communication Cluster: Wiki Page Reviews and Discussion) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<b>Reviewer:</b> Kirsten Butcher<br> | <b>Reviewer:</b> Kirsten Butcher<br> | ||
<b>Review:</b><br> | <b>Review:</b><br> | ||
| − | <i>Abstract</i>: The abstract is succinct and clear, but there are a couple things that may help the reader understand the manipulation and its important. | + | <i>Abstract</i>: The abstract is succinct and clear, but there are a couple things that may help the reader understand the manipulation and its important. |
| + | |||
| + | First, it is easy to trip up on the term "completely justified example." So, it was very helpful that you included a glossary entry for the term. But I still have some confusion. To what does "completely" refer to? Is it the number of steps shown, the inclusion of the explanation, or both? The explanations/rationale for the steps don't seem very complete (especially compared to the expanded text that one finds in standard hint sequences). So I assume the hints are "completely justified" in the sense that they give you all the steps for the problem (and add a bit of context by supplying a description). But it may help drive the point home to add a contrasting example to the glossary entry -- that is, to add a description of how the completely justified hints differ from standard hint sequences in the glossary entry. Also, adding a very brief description of each condition to the abstract text would help the reader understand the relevant comparisons (as is, the reader must first follow glossary links to develop an understanding of each condition separately, then must infer the relevant contrasts). | ||
Revision as of 17:11, 5 March 2007
Interactive Communication Cluster: Wiki Page Reviews and Discussion
Date:March 5, 2007
Reviewer: Kirsten Butcher
Review:
Abstract: The abstract is succinct and clear, but there are a couple things that may help the reader understand the manipulation and its important.
First, it is easy to trip up on the term "completely justified example." So, it was very helpful that you included a glossary entry for the term. But I still have some confusion. To what does "completely" refer to? Is it the number of steps shown, the inclusion of the explanation, or both? The explanations/rationale for the steps don't seem very complete (especially compared to the expanded text that one finds in standard hint sequences). So I assume the hints are "completely justified" in the sense that they give you all the steps for the problem (and add a bit of context by supplying a description). But it may help drive the point home to add a contrasting example to the glossary entry -- that is, to add a description of how the completely justified hints differ from standard hint sequences in the glossary entry. Also, adding a very brief description of each condition to the abstract text would help the reader understand the relevant comparisons (as is, the reader must first follow glossary links to develop an understanding of each condition separately, then must infer the relevant contrasts).
