|
|
| (10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | 1. What are 1-3 best examples of PSLC accomplishments? How have these been “transformative” (NSF buzzword) for the learning sciences or education?
| |
| | | | |
| − | Ido:
| |
| − | # Technological infrastructure for course implementation and evaluation
| |
| − | # Framework for comparison and meta-analysis of studies
| |
| − | #
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 2. What are 1-3 best of PSLC accomplishments that results, at least in part, because of having a center (these could be the same as #1)? For each, why was this accomplishment less likely to have happened without the center (i.e., why couldn’t a regular grant have resulted in the same outcome)?
| |
| − |
| |
| − | # Individual projects are islands of afordability - it is the center that bridges between them to create an infrastructure.
| |
| − | # It is through the on-going discussion and the breadth of projects that the framework was created. The framework emerged from this combination of top-down and bottom up process, that included researchers above the critical math.
| |
| − | #
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | 3. Building off what we have accomplished, what are 1-3 ideas for where PSLC research should go in the future and how would these ideas be “transformative” for learning science or education?
| |
| − |
| |
| − | # More meta-anaysis should be conducted on existing results using the existing framework. This meta-analysis should be done in two levels:
| |
| − | ## Integrating results from different studies
| |
| − | ## Looking at learning phenomenas in across existing data-sets
| |
