Difference between revisions of "Analogical comparison principle"
(→Laboratory experiment support) |
(→Brief statement of principle) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Brief statement of principle== | ==Brief statement of principle== | ||
| − | Analogical comparison can facilitate schema abstraction and transfer of that knowledge to new problem. By comparing the commonalities between two examples, students | + | Analogical comparison can facilitate schema abstraction and transfer of that knowledge to new problem. By comparing the commonalities between two examples, students can focus on the causal structure and improve their learning about the concept. |
==Description of principle== | ==Description of principle== | ||
Revision as of 16:36, 25 March 2008
Contents
Brief statement of principle
Analogical comparison can facilitate schema abstraction and transfer of that knowledge to new problem. By comparing the commonalities between two examples, students can focus on the causal structure and improve their learning about the concept.
Description of principle
Operational definition
Examples
Experimental support
Laboratory experiment support
Several factors have been shown to improve schema acquisition including: increasing the number of examples (Gick & Holyoak, 1983), increasing the variability of the examples (Chen, 1999; Paas & Merrienboer, 1994), using instructions that focus the learner on structural commonalities (Cummins, 1992; Gentner et al., 2003), focusing the learner on the subgoals of the problems (Catrambone, 1996, 1998), and using examples that minimize students cognitive load (Ward & Sweller, 1990).
In vivo experiment support
Theoretical rationale
(These entries should link to one or more learning processes.)
