Difference between revisions of "Cl2-18"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Ido: | Ido: | ||
| − | + | # Technological infrastructure for course implementation and evaluation | |
| − | + | # Framework for comparison and meta-analysis of studies | |
| − | + | # | |
2. What are 1-3 best of PSLC accomplishments that results, at least in part, because of having a center (these could be the same as #1)? For each, why was this accomplishment less likely to have happened without the center (i.e., why couldn’t a regular grant have resulted in the same outcome)? | 2. What are 1-3 best of PSLC accomplishments that results, at least in part, because of having a center (these could be the same as #1)? For each, why was this accomplishment less likely to have happened without the center (i.e., why couldn’t a regular grant have resulted in the same outcome)? | ||
| − | + | # Individual projects are islands of afordability - it is the center that bridges between them to create an infrastructure. | |
| + | # It is through the on-going discussion and the breadth of projects that the framework was created. The framework emerged from this combination of top-down and bottom up process, that included researchers above the critical math. | ||
| + | # | ||
3. Building off what we have accomplished, what are 1-3 ideas for where PSLC research should go in the future and how would these ideas be “transformative” for learning science or education? | 3. Building off what we have accomplished, what are 1-3 ideas for where PSLC research should go in the future and how would these ideas be “transformative” for learning science or education? | ||
| + | |||
| + | # More meta-anaysis should be conducted on existing results using the existing framework. This meta-analysis should be done in two levels: | ||
| + | ## Integrating results from different studies | ||
| + | ## Looking at learning phenomenas in across existing data-sets | ||
Revision as of 17:23, 18 February 2008
1. What are 1-3 best examples of PSLC accomplishments? How have these been “transformative” (NSF buzzword) for the learning sciences or education?
Ido:
- Technological infrastructure for course implementation and evaluation
- Framework for comparison and meta-analysis of studies
2. What are 1-3 best of PSLC accomplishments that results, at least in part, because of having a center (these could be the same as #1)? For each, why was this accomplishment less likely to have happened without the center (i.e., why couldn’t a regular grant have resulted in the same outcome)?
- Individual projects are islands of afordability - it is the center that bridges between them to create an infrastructure.
- It is through the on-going discussion and the breadth of projects that the framework was created. The framework emerged from this combination of top-down and bottom up process, that included researchers above the critical math.
3. Building off what we have accomplished, what are 1-3 ideas for where PSLC research should go in the future and how would these ideas be “transformative” for learning science or education?
- More meta-anaysis should be conducted on existing results using the existing framework. This meta-analysis should be done in two levels:
- Integrating results from different studies
- Looking at learning phenomenas in across existing data-sets
