Difference between revisions of "Understanding encoding inhibition, retrieval inhibition and destructive interference effects of errors during practice"
PhilPavlik (talk | contribs) |
PhilPavlik (talk | contribs) (→Abstract) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
=== Abstract === | === Abstract === | ||
| + | This experiment has recently begun. The hypothesis is that errors during learning reduce performance through causing some sort of interference effect. Essentially the question is if you get item A wrong at time t, does that effect the chance of getting B wrong at time t+1. If such effects occur then the model of practice used for [[optimized scheduling]] will need to be revised to be more accurate. Such an improvement in accuracy should then translate to increased gains for students that have practice controlled by the model. | ||
=== Glossary === | === Glossary === | ||
Revision as of 14:19, 29 March 2007
| PIs | Pavlik, Koedinger |
|---|---|
| Faculty | Koedinger |
| Postdocs | Pavlik |
| Others with > 160 hours | n/a |
| Learnlab | None (stimuli from Chinese learnlab) |
| Number of participants | 10 |
| Total Participant Hours | 15 |
| Datashop? | Expected date 7/15 |
Contents
Abstract
This experiment has recently begun. The hypothesis is that errors during learning reduce performance through causing some sort of interference effect. Essentially the question is if you get item A wrong at time t, does that effect the chance of getting B wrong at time t+1. If such effects occur then the model of practice used for optimized scheduling will need to be revised to be more accurate. Such an improvement in accuracy should then translate to increased gains for students that have practice controlled by the model.
Glossary
Research question
Background and significance
Dependent variables
Independent variables
Hypothesis
Findings
Explanation
Descendants
Optimizing the practice schedule
Annotated bibliography
Forthcoming
