Optimizing the practice schedule

Optimizing the practice schedule

Abstract

This project plan extends dissertation work of Pavlik. In this initial work, a model-based algorithm was described to maximize the rate of learning for simple facts using flashcard like practice by determining the best schedule of presentation for a set of facts. The goal of this project plan is to develop this initial work to allow this tutor with optimized scheduling to handle more complex information and different types of learning in more natural settings (like LearnLabs). Specifically, this project plan describes extensions to the theory in two main areas.

1. Specification of a theory of refined encoding

a. Generalization practice (multimodal and bidirectional training)

b. Discrimination practice (detailed error remediation)

2. Specification of a theory of co-training

a. Effect of declarative memory chunk sequence during learning

b. Effect of declarative memory chunks on production rule learning

These theoretical directions are intended to enhance the optimization tutor by greatly extending its capabilities.

A secondary goal of the project is to link the optimization algorithm used in this project with the larger CTAT project. In this linkage the optimization algorithm would be integrated onto the current CTAT system as a curriculum management system that could select or generate problems according to the algorithm, but using CTAT interfaces. This integration will make it easier for people to use the optimal learning system and therefore increase its impact and usefulness.

Glossary

• Optimal Spacing Intervals
• Expanding Spacing Intervals
• Wide Spacing Intervals
• Narrow Spacing Intervals

Research question

How can the optimal sequence of learning be computed?

Independent variables

Alternative structures of instructional schedule based on the predicitions of an ACT-R based cognitive model. Further independent variables include how the material is presented for each learning event and the assumptions of the model used to presents schedule the learning. The assumptions of the model include alternative analyses of task demands, the structure of relevant knowledge components, and learner background.

Dependent variables

Measures of normal and robust learning.

Hypothesis

Robust learning is increased by instructional activities that require the learner to attend to the relevant knowledge components of a learning task.

Explanation

Attention to features of the task domain as a knowledge component is processed leads to associating those features with the knowledge component. If the features are valid, then forming or strengthening such associations facilitates retrieval during subsequent assessment or instruction, and thus leads to more robust learning.

Descendents

• Understanding paired asociate transfer effects based on shared stimulus components (Pavlik, MacWhinney, Bolster, Koedinger)

• Applying optimal schedulign of practice in the Chinese Laernlab (Pavlik, MacWhinney, Sue-mei Wu, Koedinger)

Annotated bibliography

Forthcoming