Difference between revisions of "Orthography"

From LearnLab
Jump to: navigation, search
(Lexical Quality of English Second Language Learners:)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
Susan Dunlap, Benjamin Friedline, Alan Juffs, Charles A. Perfetti
 
Susan Dunlap, Benjamin Friedline, Alan Juffs, Charles A. Perfetti
  
==The Research Problem:==<br>
+
==The Research Problem:==
 
Arabic L1 students of ESL have poorer spelling (orthographic representations) than other L1 backgrounds (e.g., Korean, Chinese, Spanish). This difference cannot be accounted for by L1 writing system, L1 orthographic depth, or L2 vocabulary knowledge/fluency.
 
Arabic L1 students of ESL have poorer spelling (orthographic representations) than other L1 backgrounds (e.g., Korean, Chinese, Spanish). This difference cannot be accounted for by L1 writing system, L1 orthographic depth, or L2 vocabulary knowledge/fluency.
 
Can an intervention using focused, meaning-based encoding increase the quality of lexical representations for these learners?
 
Can an intervention using focused, meaning-based encoding increase the quality of lexical representations for these learners?
  
==The Intervention Design:==<br>
+
==The Intervention Design:==
 
Subject (between-subjects) Variables -- L1; ESL Level
 
Subject (between-subjects) Variables -- L1; ESL Level
 
Independent Variable (within-subjects) -- training condition (form only, form+meaning)
 
Independent Variable (within-subjects) -- training condition (form only, form+meaning)
 
Dependent Variables -- accuracy on audio dictation and spelling recognition tasks; gains from pre-test to post-test
 
Dependent Variables -- accuracy on audio dictation and spelling recognition tasks; gains from pre-test to post-test

Revision as of 01:28, 17 May 2009

==Lexical Quality of English Second Language Learners:

Effects of Focused Training on Orthographic Encoding Skill

Authors:

Susan Dunlap, Benjamin Friedline, Alan Juffs, Charles A. Perfetti

The Research Problem:

Arabic L1 students of ESL have poorer spelling (orthographic representations) than other L1 backgrounds (e.g., Korean, Chinese, Spanish). This difference cannot be accounted for by L1 writing system, L1 orthographic depth, or L2 vocabulary knowledge/fluency. Can an intervention using focused, meaning-based encoding increase the quality of lexical representations for these learners?

The Intervention Design:

Subject (between-subjects) Variables -- L1; ESL Level Independent Variable (within-subjects) -- training condition (form only, form+meaning) Dependent Variables -- accuracy on audio dictation and spelling recognition tasks; gains from pre-test to post-test