Difference between revisions of "Roll - Inquiry"
(New page: = Helping Students Become Better Scientists Using Structured Inquiry Tasks = === Summary Table === {| border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" style="text-align: left;" | '''PIs''' || I...) |
(→Summary Table) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | = Helping Students Become Better Scientists Using Structured Inquiry Tasks = | ||
| + | |||
= Helping Students Become Better Scientists Using Structured Inquiry Tasks = | = Helping Students Become Better Scientists Using Structured Inquiry Tasks = | ||
| Line 5: | Line 7: | ||
| '''PIs''' || Ido Roll | | '''PIs''' || Ido Roll | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | '''Other Contributers''' | + | | '''Other Contributers''' || Doug Bonn, James Day |
| − | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| '''Study Start Date''' || Jan. 1, 2010 | | '''Study Start Date''' || Jan. 1, 2010 | ||
| Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
|} | |} | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Abstract== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Background & Significance== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Glossary== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Research questions== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The project has 3 steps, each of which focuses on a different research question: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Step 1: What SRL skills are being used and practiced during structured invention tasks? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Step 2: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Independent Variables== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Dependent Variables== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Hypothesis== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Results== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Explanation== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Further Information== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Connections to Other Studies=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===Annotated Bibliography=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===References=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12(1), 1-48. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Roll, I., Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2009). Helping students know 'further' - increasing the flexibility of students' knowledge using symbolic invention tasks. In N. A. Taatgen, & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the cognitive science society. (pp. 1169-74). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 129-184. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===Future Plans=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Spring 2010: | ||
| + | Do an ethnography in in a 1st year physics lab that uses invention tasks as a normal classroom practice. | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
Revision as of 19:53, 4 December 2009
Contents
- 1 Helping Students Become Better Scientists Using Structured Inquiry Tasks
- 2 Helping Students Become Better Scientists Using Structured Inquiry Tasks
- 2.1 Summary Table
- 2.2 Abstract
- 2.3 Background & Significance
- 2.4 Glossary
- 2.5 Research questions
- 2.6 Independent Variables
- 2.7 Dependent Variables
- 2.8 Hypothesis
- 2.9 Results
- 2.10 Explanation
- 2.11 Further Information
- 2.12 Abstract
- 2.13 Background & Significance
- 2.14 Glossary
- 2.15 Research questions
- 2.16 Independent Variables
- 2.17 Dependent Variables
- 2.18 Hypothesis
- 2.19 Results
- 2.20 Explanation
- 2.21 Further Information
Helping Students Become Better Scientists Using Structured Inquiry Tasks
Helping Students Become Better Scientists Using Structured Inquiry Tasks
Summary Table
| PIs | Ido Roll |
| Other Contributers | Doug Bonn, James Day |
| Study Start Date | Jan. 1, 2010 |
| Study End Date | May. 31, 2010 |
| Site | UBC (not a LeanLab site) |
| LearnLab Course | Physics |
| Number of Students | N = ~200 |
| Total Participant Hours | ~1,000. |
| DataShop | no data yet |
Abstract
Background & Significance
Glossary
Research questions
The project has 3 steps, each of which focuses on a different research question:
Step 1: What SRL skills are being used and practiced during structured invention tasks?
Step 2:
Independent Variables
Dependent Variables
Hypothesis
Results
Explanation
Further Information
Connections to Other Studies
Annotated Bibliography
References
Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12(1), 1-48.
Roll, I., Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2009). Helping students know 'further' - increasing the flexibility of students' knowledge using symbolic invention tasks. In N. A. Taatgen, & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the cognitive science society. (pp. 1169-74). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 129-184.
Future Plans
Spring 2010: Do an ethnography in in a 1st year physics lab that uses invention tasks as a normal classroom practice.
Abstract
Background & Significance
Glossary
Research questions
The project has 3 steps, each of which focuses on a different research question:
Step 1: What SRL skills are being used and practiced during structured invention tasks?
Step 2:
Independent Variables
Dependent Variables
Hypothesis
Results
Explanation
Further Information
Connections to Other Studies
Annotated Bibliography
References
Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12(1), 1-48.
Roll, I., Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2009). Helping students know 'further' - increasing the flexibility of students' knowledge using symbolic invention tasks. In N. A. Taatgen, & H. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the cognitive science society. (pp. 1169-74). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004). Inventing to prepare for future learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 129-184.
Future Plans
Spring 2010: Do an ethnography in in a 1st year physics lab that uses invention tasks as a normal classroom practice.
