Difference between revisions of "Talk:Social and Communicative Factors in Learning"
(New page: Lauren suggests looking at work Shayer and Adey. Here are a couple of references: * Adey, P.S. & Shayer, M. (1990). Accelerating the development of formal thinking in middle and high sch...) |
(→this recent paper looks potentially interesting) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Lauren suggests looking at work Shayer and Adey. Here are a couple of references: | Lauren suggests looking at work Shayer and Adey. Here are a couple of references: | ||
| − | * Adey, P.S. & Shayer, M. (1990). Accelerating the development of formal thinking in middle | + | * Adey, P.S. & Shayer, M. (1990). Accelerating the development of formal thinking in middle and high school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(31), 267 - 285. |
| − | and high school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(31, 267 - 285. | + | * Adey, P.S. & Shayer, M. (1994). Really Raising Standards: cognitive intervention and academic achievement. London: Routledge. |
| − | * Adey, P.S. & Shayer, M. (1994). Really Raising Standards: cognitive intervention and | + | |
| − | academic achievement. London: Routledge. | + | Following a more recent conversation with Lauren, here are a few others: |
| + | * [http://www.robinalexander.org.uk Alexander, R.] (2000) Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education Blackwell , Oxford | ||
| + | * Alexander, R. (2008) Towards teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. 4th ed., Dialogos , York, England | ||
| + | * [http://www.robinalexander.org.uk Alexander, R.] Mercer, N. and Hodgkinson, S. (eds) (2005) [[Media: Robinalexander_IACEP_2005.pdf | Culture, dialogue and learning: Notes on an emerging pedagogy. Exploring talk in school]] Sage , London. | ||
| + | |||
| + | In the spirit of "do now and ask forgiveness later", I'm going to add these references on the main page of the article. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Koedinger|Koedinger]] 10:53, 2 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == this recent paper looks potentially interesting == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Mercer, N. (2008). [[Media: Mercer2008-Time&ClassroomDialogue.pdf | The Seeds of Time: Why Classroom Dialogue Needs a Temporal Analysis]]. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 33-59. doi:10.1080/10508400701793182. | ||
| + | --[[User:Koedinger|Koedinger]] 11:19, 2 April 2010 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The Mercer paper in JLS is interesting - but qualitative / conceptual. There are also interesting quantitative methodologies for including temporal dimensions into conversational analyses developed by Ming Ming Chiu (Buffalo)that are worth looking at. [[Image:M. M. Chiu Flowing Toward Correct Contributions.pdf | Chiu (2008) in JLS]] | ||
| + | Christa | ||
Latest revision as of 15:25, 9 April 2010
Lauren suggests looking at work Shayer and Adey. Here are a couple of references:
- Adey, P.S. & Shayer, M. (1990). Accelerating the development of formal thinking in middle and high school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(31), 267 - 285.
- Adey, P.S. & Shayer, M. (1994). Really Raising Standards: cognitive intervention and academic achievement. London: Routledge.
Following a more recent conversation with Lauren, here are a few others:
- Alexander, R. (2000) Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education Blackwell , Oxford
- Alexander, R. (2008) Towards teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. 4th ed., Dialogos , York, England
- Alexander, R. Mercer, N. and Hodgkinson, S. (eds) (2005) Culture, dialogue and learning: Notes on an emerging pedagogy. Exploring talk in school Sage , London.
In the spirit of "do now and ask forgiveness later", I'm going to add these references on the main page of the article.
--Koedinger 10:53, 2 April 2010 (EDT)
this recent paper looks potentially interesting
- Mercer, N. (2008). The Seeds of Time: Why Classroom Dialogue Needs a Temporal Analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 33-59. doi:10.1080/10508400701793182.
--Koedinger 11:19, 2 April 2010 (EDT)
- The Mercer paper in JLS is interesting - but qualitative / conceptual. There are also interesting quantitative methodologies for including temporal dimensions into conversational analyses developed by Ming Ming Chiu (Buffalo)that are worth looking at. File:M. M. Chiu Flowing Toward Correct Contributions.pdf
Christa
