Difference between revisions of "Jointly constructed explanation"
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Jill presents a proposition (i.e., the forces are different), and Sara supplies the justification (i.e., ''because'' the masses are different). | Jill presents a proposition (i.e., the forces are different), and Sara supplies the justification (i.e., ''because'' the masses are different). | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Glossary]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Independent Variables]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Interactive Communication]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Hausmann_Study2]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:21, 18 April 2007
Jointly constructed explanation: a statement or set of statements, spread across two (or more) speakers that makes explicit the causal or relational connection between concepts. Here is an example of a jointly constructed explanation in the domain of kinematics (from Hausmann, Chi, & Roy, 2004):
| Jill: | Force acting on block B, is different from force acting on block A. |
|---|---|
| Sara: | Ok. Because their mass, is different. |
| Jill: | Yeah. Because-yeah. |
Jill presents a proposition (i.e., the forces are different), and Sara supplies the justification (i.e., because the masses are different).
