Difference between revisions of "Jointly constructed explanation"

From LearnLab
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
Jill presents a proposition (i.e., the forces are different), and Sara supplies the justification (i.e., ''because'' the masses are different).
 
Jill presents a proposition (i.e., the forces are different), and Sara supplies the justification (i.e., ''because'' the masses are different).
 +
 +
 +
[[Category:Glossary]]
 +
[[Category:Independent Variables]]
 +
[[Category:Interactive Communication]]
 +
[[Category:Hausmann_Study2]]

Latest revision as of 09:21, 18 April 2007

Jointly constructed explanation: a statement or set of statements, spread across two (or more) speakers that makes explicit the causal or relational connection between concepts. Here is an example of a jointly constructed explanation in the domain of kinematics (from Hausmann, Chi, & Roy, 2004):

Jill: Force acting on block B, is different from force acting on block A.
Sara: Ok. Because their mass, is different.
Jill: Yeah. Because-yeah.

Jill presents a proposition (i.e., the forces are different), and Sara supplies the justification (i.e., because the masses are different).