Difference between revisions of "Collaboration scripts"

From LearnLab
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reverted edits by Sitamoyer (Talk); changed back to last version by Bobhaus)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Collaboration scripts structure the collaboration process by guiding the interacting partners through a sequence of interaction phases with designated activities and roles. Scripts are expected to promote learning by prompting cognitive, [[metacognition|metacognitive]] and social processes that might otherwise not occur, i.e. students are more likely to traverse useful learning paths than in unscripted collaboration. For example, the script prompts interacting partners to engage in activities like posing questions, providing explanations, and giving feedback.
+
Collaboration scripts (e.g., King, Staffieri, & Adelgais, 1998; Fischer, Bruhn, Graesel, & Mandl, 2002; Soller, 2004; Rummel & Spada, 2005; Elaine B. Coleman, 1998; Bereiter & Scardamalia, 1989) are an [[instructional method]] that structures the [[collaboration|Collaboration]] process by guiding the interacting partners through a sequence of interaction phases with designated activities and roles. This method often involves first teaching students how to collaborate then providing prompts or sentence openers that scaffold the scripted collaboration.
  
Dillenbourg and Jermann (2006) describe different core scripts, i.e. schemata lying at the heart of any particular collaboration script. They distinguish between jigsaw, conflict and reciprocal script approaches.
+
Scripts are expected to promote learning by prompting cognitive, [[metacognition|metacognitive]] and social processes that might otherwise not occur, i.e. students are more likely to traverse useful learning paths than in unscripted collaboration. For example, the script prompts interacting partners to engage in activities like posing questions, providing explanations, and giving feedback.
 +
 
 +
Dillenbourg and Jermann (2006) describe different core scripts, i.e. schemata lying at the heart of any particular collaboration script. They distinguish between jigsaw, conflict and reciprocal script approaches. A reflection phase is often included in scripts.
 +
 
 +
This method of instruction includes simple prompting, e.g., for self-explanation while a pair is studying an example [[Hausmann_Study2|Hausmann & VanLehn, 2007]].
 +
 
 +
We do not include reciprocal teaching under this category as it includes modeling and other teacher-led activities. 
  
 
*Dillenbourg, P. & Jermann, P. (2006). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl &, J. Haake, ''Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge. Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives'' (pp. 259-288). New York: Springer.  
 
*Dillenbourg, P. & Jermann, P. (2006). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl &, J. Haake, ''Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge. Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives'' (pp. 259-288). New York: Springer.  
  
 
[[Category:Glossary]]
 
[[Category:Glossary]]
 
+
[[Category:Interactive Communication]]
 
[[Category:Scripted Collaborative Problem Solving]]
 
[[Category:Scripted Collaborative Problem Solving]]
[[Category:Independent variables]]
+
[[Category:Independent Variables]]

Latest revision as of 15:24, 31 August 2011

Collaboration scripts (e.g., King, Staffieri, & Adelgais, 1998; Fischer, Bruhn, Graesel, & Mandl, 2002; Soller, 2004; Rummel & Spada, 2005; Elaine B. Coleman, 1998; Bereiter & Scardamalia, 1989) are an instructional method that structures the Collaboration process by guiding the interacting partners through a sequence of interaction phases with designated activities and roles. This method often involves first teaching students how to collaborate then providing prompts or sentence openers that scaffold the scripted collaboration.

Scripts are expected to promote learning by prompting cognitive, metacognitive and social processes that might otherwise not occur, i.e. students are more likely to traverse useful learning paths than in unscripted collaboration. For example, the script prompts interacting partners to engage in activities like posing questions, providing explanations, and giving feedback.

Dillenbourg and Jermann (2006) describe different core scripts, i.e. schemata lying at the heart of any particular collaboration script. They distinguish between jigsaw, conflict and reciprocal script approaches. A reflection phase is often included in scripts.

This method of instruction includes simple prompting, e.g., for self-explanation while a pair is studying an example Hausmann & VanLehn, 2007.

We do not include reciprocal teaching under this category as it includes modeling and other teacher-led activities.

  • Dillenbourg, P. & Jermann, P. (2006). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl &, J. Haake, Scripting computer-supported communication of knowledge. Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives (pp. 259-288). New York: Springer.