Difference between revisions of "Talk:Visual Representations in Science Learning"
(New page: This page is very impressive! Some suggested improvements: - References in Background section are missing from the Reference section. - The relevant findings sections could make relevan...) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
This page is very impressive! | This page is very impressive! | ||
Some suggested improvements: | Some suggested improvements: | ||
| − | + | * Include the overall means and statistical results for in vivo study #4. | |
| − | + | * The relevant findings sections could make relevant references to Davenport papers in the Reference section. | |
| − | + | * References in Background section are missing from the Reference section. | |
| + | * "Coordination" and "integration" seem to be used interchangeably. Are they different or can they be collapsed? | ||
Latest revision as of 11:44, 23 April 2008
This page is very impressive! Some suggested improvements:
- Include the overall means and statistical results for in vivo study #4.
- The relevant findings sections could make relevant references to Davenport papers in the Reference section.
- References in Background section are missing from the Reference section.
- "Coordination" and "integration" seem to be used interchangeably. Are they different or can they be collapsed?
