Difference between revisions of "Gifted"

From LearnLab
Jump to: navigation, search
(Motivation as Facilitating Giftedness)
(Motivation as Facilitating Giftedness)
Line 26: Line 26:
  
 
===Motivation as Facilitating Giftedness===
 
===Motivation as Facilitating Giftedness===
[[Image:Gagne, 2000.jpg|thumb|Gagne (2000) Ten Commandments for Academic Talent Development]]
 
  
 
Considered the traditional approach to giftedness, this theory looks at the ability of the gifted individual as playing the largest role in the development of gifted behavior. A popular model for this theory is the Differentiated Models of Giftedness and Talent (DMGT). Proposed by Francoys Gange, this model places a distinction between gift and later talent. Natural ability or gift is the inherited ability of the person, and can be intellectual, creative, socioaffective or sensory motor. Talent is the how, through a series of affecters, this gift is expressed. The talent may be in a variety of areas, such as academics, the arts, or sports.  
 
Considered the traditional approach to giftedness, this theory looks at the ability of the gifted individual as playing the largest role in the development of gifted behavior. A popular model for this theory is the Differentiated Models of Giftedness and Talent (DMGT). Proposed by Francoys Gange, this model places a distinction between gift and later talent. Natural ability or gift is the inherited ability of the person, and can be intellectual, creative, socioaffective or sensory motor. Talent is the how, through a series of affecters, this gift is expressed. The talent may be in a variety of areas, such as academics, the arts, or sports.  
 +
[[Image:Gagne, 2000.jpg|thumb|Gagne (2000) Ten Commandments for Academic Talent Development]]
  
 
Among the traditional views, this can be considered an advanced one. Whereas older theories saw raw gift as the sole measure for later talent, this model sees various affecters as playing a moderating role. One of the affecters that aids the development of talent is motivation (cited as an intrapersonal catalyst). Among these catalysts are also self-awareness, environmental catalysts, and even chance is accounted for. Yet for the considerations and advancements it makes, we see how each of these catalysts remains just that, a catalyst. Their primary role continues to be as assisting the development of the talent and thus limited by the magnitude of the natural ability.  
 
Among the traditional views, this can be considered an advanced one. Whereas older theories saw raw gift as the sole measure for later talent, this model sees various affecters as playing a moderating role. One of the affecters that aids the development of talent is motivation (cited as an intrapersonal catalyst). Among these catalysts are also self-awareness, environmental catalysts, and even chance is accounted for. Yet for the considerations and advancements it makes, we see how each of these catalysts remains just that, a catalyst. Their primary role continues to be as assisting the development of the talent and thus limited by the magnitude of the natural ability.  

Revision as of 09:56, 26 March 2009

This page is reserved for work on the topic of intellectual giftedness and motivation.

Giftedness or Intellectual Giftedness is characterized by intellectual development in children that surpasses those of their same age. Gifted children often show greater ability at grasping harder academic concepts and at times greater creativity than those of their same grade level.

Measuring Intellectual Giftedness

Though all measures of giftedness attempt to classify students with intellectual ability higher than their peers, it continues to be heavily debated. In the United States public school system the classification of gifted individuals is reffered to as:

a child or youth who performs at or shows the potential for performing at a remarkably high level of accomplishment when compared to others of the same age, experience or environment and who:

1) exhibits high performance capability in an intellectual, creative, or artistic area

2) possesses and unusual capacity for leadership or

Normal Distribution

3) excels in a specific academic field

(74th legislature of the State of Texas, Chapter 29, Subchapter D, Section 29.121) Identifying Gifted Students

Yet even if the US public school identifies various factors as playing a part in giftedness, the IQ test is still considered to be the central tool in diagnosing giftedness. This is due to its consistency and high level of development, which allows for a particular student's scores to be measures against a very large sample's score.

Within studies that use IQ tests, the The common cutoff for giftedness is one standard deviation above the mean, or 84th percentile and above.

Giftedness and Motivation

The split in the role of motivation and giftedness is between those that theorize giftedness as being a mixture of talent and motivation and those that theorize giftedness as innate talent.

Motivation as Facilitating Giftedness

Considered the traditional approach to giftedness, this theory looks at the ability of the gifted individual as playing the largest role in the development of gifted behavior. A popular model for this theory is the Differentiated Models of Giftedness and Talent (DMGT). Proposed by Francoys Gange, this model places a distinction between gift and later talent. Natural ability or gift is the inherited ability of the person, and can be intellectual, creative, socioaffective or sensory motor. Talent is the how, through a series of affecters, this gift is expressed. The talent may be in a variety of areas, such as academics, the arts, or sports.

Gagne (2000) Ten Commandments for Academic Talent Development

Among the traditional views, this can be considered an advanced one. Whereas older theories saw raw gift as the sole measure for later talent, this model sees various affecters as playing a moderating role. One of the affecters that aids the development of talent is motivation (cited as an intrapersonal catalyst). Among these catalysts are also self-awareness, environmental catalysts, and even chance is accounted for. Yet for the considerations and advancements it makes, we see how each of these catalysts remains just that, a catalyst. Their primary role continues to be as assisting the development of the talent and thus limited by the magnitude of the natural ability.

The 6 affecters of natural ability into talent in the DMGT are 1) the natural ability or gift 2) chance 3) intrapersonal catalyst 4) environmental catalyst 5) learning/practice and 6) talent. Gift is not only an indication of the individual’s ability, but also indicates a level of specificity. In this case natural ability can be intellectual, creative, etc, and with varying degrees of each. Chance is seen as simply how chance plays into development and accounts for the randomness of the child’s development. Intrapersonal catalysts include motivation and self discipline as well as how personality traits develop ability. Environmental catalysts look at how external factors, like parents and teachers, facilitate development. Learning and practice are given the a larger role over the catalysts mentioned in development of natural talent. This not only shapes talent in how strong it is, but also contextually (such as either arts or academics). Finally, talent is the developmental endpoint and is as contextually specific as natural ability. Talent thus has a variety of areas that it develops into, such as sports or social action.

Motivation as a Central role in Giftedness

Socio-Contextual Model