Difference between revisions of "Contiguous Representations for Robust Learning (Aleven & Butcher)"

From LearnLab
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Research question)
m (Research question)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
=== Research question ===
 
=== Research question ===
**Do students learn more with contiguous representations that support direct students' interaction and reasoning with diagrams during practice? Is a contiguous representation sufficient to support [[integration]] of visual and verbal knowledge components?
+
*Do students learn more with contiguous representations that support direct students' interaction and reasoning with diagrams during practice? Is a contiguous representation sufficient to support [[integration]] of visual and verbal knowledge components?

Revision as of 15:39, 26 February 2007

Learning with Diagrams in Geometry: Strategic Support for Robust Learning

Vincent Aleven & Kirsten Butcher

Abstract

Does integration of visual and verbal knowledge during learning support deep understanding? Can student interactions with visual information during problem-solving support robust learning? The overall goal of this project is to gain a better understanding of 1) visual and verbal knowledge components in a problem-solving environment and, 2) how interacting with visual information can support the development of deep understanding. Ultimately, we are interested in coordination and integration processes in learning with visual and verbal knowledge components, and how these processes may support robust learning.

We are using the Geometry Cognitive Tutor as a research vehicle for our project. In geometry, visual information is represented in a problem diagram and verbal/symbolic information is represented in text that contains given and goal information as well as in conceptual rules/principles of geometry. The goals of this research are to investigate how coordination between and integration of visual and verbal information influence robust learning processes, as measured by knowledge retention and transfer. By coordination, we mean the processes that support mapping between relevant visual and verbal information as well as the processes that keep relevant knowledge components active. For example, in geometry a student needs to map between text references to angles and their location in a diagram and will need to maintain the numerical (given or solved) value of that angle to use in problem solving. By integration, we mean knowledge construction events that involve both visual and verbal knowledge components. For example, in geometry a student may need to construct an understanding of linear angles that includes both a verbal definition (e.g., “two adjacent angles that form a line”) and a visual situation description (e.g., a visual representation of the two angles formed by intersection of a line).

Glossary

See Visual-Verbal Learning Project Glossary

Research question

  • Do students learn more with contiguous representations that support direct students' interaction and reasoning with diagrams during practice? Is a contiguous representation sufficient to support integration of visual and verbal knowledge components?