Educational Research Methods 10: Difference between revisions

From Theory Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Koedinger (talk | contribs)
New page: Course page ...
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Course page ...
Course page ...
Research Methods for the Learning Sciences
85-748
Spring 2008 Syllabus Carnegie Mellon University
General Information Class times: 4:30 to 5:50 Tuesday & Thursday
in NSH 3001
Instructors: Professor Kenneth R. Koedinger
Office hours by appointment
Location: 3601 Newell-Simon Hall
Phone: 8-7667
Email: Koedinger@cmu.edu
Dr. Philip I. Pavlik Jr.
Office hours by appointment
Location: 300S Craig St, 224
Phone: 8-1618
Email: ppavlik@andrew.cmu.edu
Class URL:  TBD
The goals of this course are to learn data collection, design, and analysis methodologies that are particularly useful for scientific research in education.  The course will be organized in modules addressing particular topics including overview of methods, cognitive task analysis, qualitative methods, protocol and discourse analysis, and educational data mining and log analysis.  A key goal is to help students think about and learn how to apply these methods to their own research programs.
Course Prerequisites To enroll you must have taken 85-738, "Educational Goals, Instruction, and Assessment" or get the permission of the instruction. 
Readings Textbook: "The Research Methods Knowledge Base: 3rd edition" by William M.K. Trochim and James P. Donnelly
Other readings will be assigned in class. 
Reading Reports Students are required to submit at least two posts per week to the course discussion group/blog before class, on either Sunday/Monday/Tuesday before class (for readings due Tuesday) or on Tuesday/Wednesday/Thursday before class (for readings due Thursday). These posts can be about
1) a question you had about the reading, something important you did not understand
2) an idea inspired by the reading
3) an interesting connection with something you learned or did previously in this or another course, or in other professional work or research
4) an on-topic, relevant response, clarification, or further comment on another student’s post
Grading In order to make the grading as systematic and equitable as possible, we are using a point system in which each homework assignment and the exams are given a certain number of points. Points associated with each assignment are listed below.
Assignments
Homework
  1. Tutor Evaluation
  2. Addition Pseudo Tutor
  3. Tutor Modification Task1
  4. Tutor Modification Task21
  5. Think Aloud &
Difficulty Factors Assessment1
Final Project1
Mid-term Exam
Final Exam
Reading Reports
Instructors’ Judgment2
Total
Points
270
30
  40
  40
70
 
90
 
160
200
200
120
50
1000
       
1These are pair or group assignments.
2Note, 5% of your course grade will be based on the instructors’ judgment of your level of learning , whether you have learned more or less than is  reflected in the points you have earned. This judgment will be influenced by your class and group participation. Thus, regular attendance and active participation in group and class meetings is in your interest.
Converting group grades to individual grades 
Group homework grades are closely tied to individual grade. For example, if the group grade is 25 points, each individual member is likely to receive 25 points. However, to avoid rewarding free riding, distinctions will be made among individuals. We will not have adequate personal information to distinguish among group members for group work. Therefore in assigning individual grades, private evaluations from all group members will be solicited at the end of the course. These evaluations will take the form of a questionnaire asking each group member to allocate, among 100% of the total effort, the responsibility among the members for the group's homework assignments.
Class Schedule for Research Methods for the Learning Sciences
Spring 2008 (Topics continue into blanks!)
1-13 Basic Research & Experimental Methods (Koedinger, Pavlik)
1-15
1-20
1-22
1-27 Cognitive Task Analysis (Koedinger, Pavlik)
1-29
2-3 
2-5 Video and Verbal Protocol Analysis (Lovett, Rosé)
2-10
2-12
2-17
2-19
2-24
2-26 Ethnography & Design Experiments?
3-3  Surveys, Questionnaires, Interviews (Kiesler)
3-5 
3-10 NO CLASS – Spring break
3-12 NO CLASS – Spring break
3-17 Psychometrics, reliability, Item Response Theory (Junker, Koedinger)
3-19
3-24
3-26 Educational data mining (Scheines, Pavlik)
3-31
4-2
4-7
4-9
4-14
4-16 NO CLASS – Spring Carnival
4-21  Cognitive Task Analysis - Revisited (Koedinger, Pavlik)
4-23
4-28 Wrap-up
4-30 Wrap-up

Revision as of 15:43, 1 December 2008

Course page ... Research Methods for the Learning Sciences 85-748 Spring 2008 Syllabus Carnegie Mellon University

General Information Class times: 4:30 to 5:50 Tuesday & Thursday in NSH 3001

Instructors: Professor Kenneth R. Koedinger Office hours by appointment Location: 3601 Newell-Simon Hall Phone: 8-7667 Email: Koedinger@cmu.edu

Dr. Philip I. Pavlik Jr. Office hours by appointment Location: 300S Craig St, 224 Phone: 8-1618 Email: ppavlik@andrew.cmu.edu

Class URL: TBD


The goals of this course are to learn data collection, design, and analysis methodologies that are particularly useful for scientific research in education. The course will be organized in modules addressing particular topics including overview of methods, cognitive task analysis, qualitative methods, protocol and discourse analysis, and educational data mining and log analysis. A key goal is to help students think about and learn how to apply these methods to their own research programs.

Course Prerequisites To enroll you must have taken 85-738, "Educational Goals, Instruction, and Assessment" or get the permission of the instruction.

Readings Textbook: "The Research Methods Knowledge Base: 3rd edition" by William M.K. Trochim and James P. Donnelly Other readings will be assigned in class.

Reading Reports Students are required to submit at least two posts per week to the course discussion group/blog before class, on either Sunday/Monday/Tuesday before class (for readings due Tuesday) or on Tuesday/Wednesday/Thursday before class (for readings due Thursday). These posts can be about 1) a question you had about the reading, something important you did not understand 2) an idea inspired by the reading 3) an interesting connection with something you learned or did previously in this or another course, or in other professional work or research 4) an on-topic, relevant response, clarification, or further comment on another student’s post




Grading In order to make the grading as systematic and equitable as possible, we are using a point system in which each homework assignment and the exams are given a certain number of points. Points associated with each assignment are listed below.

Assignments

Homework

 1. Tutor Evaluation
 2. Addition Pseudo Tutor
 3. Tutor Modification Task1
 4. Tutor Modification Task21
 5. Think Aloud & 

Difficulty Factors Assessment1

Final Project1

Mid-term Exam Final Exam

Reading Reports Instructors’ Judgment2

Total Points

270 30

 	40
 	40

70

90


160

200 200

		120
		50

1000


1These are pair or group assignments.

2Note, 5% of your course grade will be based on the instructors’ judgment of your level of learning , whether you have learned more or less than is reflected in the points you have earned. This judgment will be influenced by your class and group participation. Thus, regular attendance and active participation in group and class meetings is in your interest.

Converting group grades to individual grades Group homework grades are closely tied to individual grade. For example, if the group grade is 25 points, each individual member is likely to receive 25 points. However, to avoid rewarding free riding, distinctions will be made among individuals. We will not have adequate personal information to distinguish among group members for group work. Therefore in assigning individual grades, private evaluations from all group members will be solicited at the end of the course. These evaluations will take the form of a questionnaire asking each group member to allocate, among 100% of the total effort, the responsibility among the members for the group's homework assignments.






Class Schedule for Research Methods for the Learning Sciences Spring 2008 (Topics continue into blanks!)

1-13 Basic Research & Experimental Methods (Koedinger, Pavlik)
1-15
1-20 
1-22 
1-27 Cognitive Task Analysis (Koedinger, Pavlik)
1-29 
2-3  
2-5 Video and Verbal Protocol Analysis (Lovett, Rosé)
2-10 
2-12
2-17
2-19
2-24 
2-26 Ethnography & Design Experiments?
3-3  Surveys, Questionnaires, Interviews (Kiesler)
3-5  
3-10 NO CLASS – Spring break
3-12 NO CLASS – Spring break
3-17 Psychometrics, reliability, Item Response Theory (Junker, Koedinger)
3-19 
3-24 
3-26 Educational data mining (Scheines, Pavlik)
3-31
4-2
4-7
4-9 
4-14 
4-16 NO CLASS – Spring Carnival
4-21  Cognitive Task Analysis - Revisited (Koedinger, Pavlik)
4-23
4-28 Wrap-up
4-30 Wrap-up