Talk:Refinement and Fluency - Revision history

Koedinger at 17:12, 20 December 2007

2007-12-20T17:12:38Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:12, 20 December 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Ken Koedinger: I don't follow why certain (any?) studies are under the Explicit Instruction heading C (Explicit instruction: Practice and Scheduling). The treatment in Pavlik's and Cen's studies are quite implicit -- variations in the timing and/or amount of practice. There is no explicit verbalization involved in either treatment -- see the definitions of [[explicit instruction]] and [[implicit instruction]].		Ken Koedinger: I don't follow why certain (any?) studies are under the Explicit Instruction heading C (Explicit instruction: Practice and Scheduling). The treatment in Pavlik's and Cen's studies are quite implicit -- variations in the timing and/or amount of practice. There is no explicit verbalization involved in either treatment -- see the definitions of [[explicit instruction]] and [[implicit instruction]] as well as the associated hypotheses further above on the page.

	I think these Practice and Scheduling studies would be better in their own category, as I believe was the case earlier (which is why I am putting this in the discussion rather just changing it back). Alternatively, they seem more closely aligned with "Availability of knowledge during learning", where Pavlik is also listed, or with "Active Processing".		I think these Practice and Scheduling studies would be better in their own category, as I believe was the case earlier (which is why I am putting this in the discussion rather just changing it back). Alternatively, they seem more closely aligned with "Availability of knowledge during learning", where Pavlik is also listed, or with "Active Processing".

Koedinger at 17:11, 20 December 2007

2007-12-20T17:11:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 20 December 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
			Ken Koedinger: I don't follow why certain (any?) studies are under the Explicit Instruction heading C (Explicit instruction: Practice and Scheduling). The treatment in Pavlik's and Cen's studies are quite implicit -- variations in the timing and/or amount of practice. There is no explicit verbalization involved in either treatment -- see the definitions of [[explicit instruction]] and [[implicit instruction]].

	~~Ken Koedinger:~~ I ~~don't follow why certain studies are under the Explicit Instruction heading #3. The treatment in Pavlik's~~ and ~~Cen's~~ studies ~~are quite implicit -- variations~~ in the ~~timing and/or amount of practice. There~~ is ~~no explicit verbalization involved~~ in ~~either treatment -- see~~ the ~~definitions~~ of ~~[[explicit instruction]] and [[implicit instruction]]~~.		I think these Practice and Scheduling studies would be better in their own category, as I believe was the case earlier (which is why I am putting this in the discussion rather just changing it back). Alternatively, they seem more closely aligned with "Availability of knowledge during learning", where Pavlik is also listed, or with "Active Processing".

Koedinger: New page: Ken Koedinger: I don't follow why certain studies are under the Explicit Instruction heading #3. The treatment in Pavlik's and Cen's studies are quite implicit -- variations in the tim...

2007-12-20T17:04:38Z

New page: Ken Koedinger: I don't follow why certain studies are under the Explicit Instruction heading #3. The treatment in Pavlik's and Cen's studies are quite implicit -- variations in the tim...

New page

Ken Koedinger: I don't follow why certain studies are under the Explicit Instruction heading #3. The treatment in Pavlik's and Cen's studies are quite implicit -- variations in the timing and/or amount of practice. There is no explicit verbalization involved in either treatment -- see the definitions of [[explicit instruction]] and [[implicit instruction]].