Talk:In vivo experiment - Revision history

Koedinger at 15:18, 21 October 2010

2010-10-21T15:18:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:18, 21 October 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:
	== Should the idea be called "in situ" rather than "in vivo"? ==		== Should the idea be called "in situ" rather than "in vivo"? ==

			Here's an email dialog, started by Jacqueline Bourdeau, around the question of whether we should use "in situ experiment" rather than "in vivo experiment". Perhaps some of this dialog should get into the article ...
	Here's a email dialog around the question of whether we should use "in situ experiment" rather than "in vivo experiment". Perhaps some of this dialog should get into the article ...

	Hi Jacqueline,		Hi Jacqueline,
Line 30:		Line 29:


	On 10/21/10 10:10 AM, Jacqueline Bourdeau wrote:		On 10/21/10 10:10 AM, Jacqueline Bourdeau wrote:
	> In vivo experiment:		> In vivo experiment:
	> - 'experiment' includes control and manipulation		> - 'experiment' includes control and manipulation

Koedinger: Typo in title

2010-10-21T15:13:32Z

Typo in title

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 21 October 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	"One explanation for the limited use of instructional practices based on cognitive science rests in the differences between classrooms and laboratories. In contrast to learning in laboratory settings, learning in classrooms typically involves content of greater complexity and scope, delivered and tested over much longer periods of time, with much greater variability in delivery, and with far more distraction and competition for student time and effort. Before principles of learning from cognitive science can be applied to classroom instruction, we need to understand if the principles generalize beyond well controlled laboratory settings to the complex cognitive and social conditions of the classroom."		"One explanation for the limited use of instructional practices based on cognitive science rests in the differences between classrooms and laboratories. In contrast to learning in laboratory settings, learning in classrooms typically involves content of greater complexity and scope, delivered and tested over much longer periods of time, with much greater variability in delivery, and with far more distraction and competition for student time and effort. Before principles of learning from cognitive science can be applied to classroom instruction, we need to understand if the principles generalize beyond well controlled laboratory settings to the complex cognitive and social conditions of the classroom."

	== Should the idea be ~~call~~ "in situ" rather than "in vivo"? ==		== Should the idea be called "in situ" rather than "in vivo"? ==

Koedinger: New section: Should the idea be call "in situ" rather than "in vivo"?

2010-10-21T15:11:54Z

New section: Should the idea be call "in situ" rather than "in vivo"?

Show changes

Koedinger: Anything from this Whitehurst quote worth adding?

2010-04-15T09:37:10Z

Anything from this Whitehurst quote worth adding?

New page

== Anything from this Whitehurst quote worth adding? ==

Russ Whitehurst on an [http://www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/getArticle.cfm?id=1935 APS Observer web page] said:
"One explanation for the limited use of instructional practices based on cognitive science rests in the differences between classrooms and laboratories. In contrast to learning in laboratory settings, learning in classrooms typically involves content of greater complexity and scope, delivered and tested over much longer periods of time, with much greater variability in delivery, and with far more distraction and competition for student time and effort. Before principles of learning from cognitive science can be applied to classroom instruction, we need to understand if the principles generalize beyond well controlled laboratory settings to the complex cognitive and social conditions of the classroom."