Error correction support - Revision history

Dawn E. McCormick at 15:01, 24 May 2007

2007-05-24T15:01:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:01, 24 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Prompting error repair is an instructional method where students are invited to detect and/or correct errors (Reif & Scott, 1999; Essay errors...).		Prompting error repair is an instructional method where students are invited to detect and/or correct errors (Reif & Scott, 1999; Essay errors...).

	For instance, [[The self-correction of speech errors (McCormick, O’Neill & Siskin)\|McCormick et al]] invite ESL students to detect of errors in recordings of their speech, and activity formerly done only by teachers. [[Booth\|Booth et al.]] showed students some instructor-authored errors, and had them explain why the errors were wrong.		For instance, [[The self-correction of speech errors (McCormick, O’Neill & Siskin)\|McCormick et al]] invite ESL students to detect errors in recordings of their speech, and activity formerly done only by teachers. For example, while listening to her recording of her speech and reviewing the transcript of that speech, the student detects and corrects the following word choice error: "I said, 'I can't predict this problem.' I should have said, 'I can't fix this problem.'"

			[[Booth\|Booth et al.]] showed students some instructor-authored errors, and had them explain why the errors were wrong.

	In the[[Student_Uncertainty\|Forbes-Riley & Litman]] study, if students give a correct response but the intonation contour of their spoken response indicates uncertainty, then the tutoring system gives them the same remediation (a subdialogue) as it would if the response were incorrect. Although this manipulation is perhaps not a close fit to the method of prompting error repair, it does invite students to treat their uncertainty as an error and to "repair" it.		In the[[Student_Uncertainty\|Forbes-Riley & Litman]] study, if students give a correct response but the intonation contour of their spoken response indicates uncertainty, then the tutoring system gives them the same remediation (a subdialogue) as it would if the response were incorrect. Although this manipulation is perhaps not a close fit to the method of prompting error repair, it does invite students to treat their uncertainty as an error and to "repair" it.

Vanlehn at 17:46, 23 May 2007

2007-05-23T17:46:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:46, 23 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Prompting error repair is an instructional method where students are invited to detect and/or correct errors (Reif & Scott; Essay errors...) ~~support is an instructional variable that compares detection and/or correction of errors by the student versus by another agent, e.g., a tutoring system or teacher~~.		Prompting error repair is an instructional method where students are invited to detect and/or correct errors (Reif & Scott, 1999; Essay errors...).

	~~The manipulation may compare student detection of errors to other-agent detection (see~~ [[The self-correction of speech errors (McCormick, O’Neill & Siskin)\|McCormick et al]] ~~study)~~.		For instance, [[The self-correction of speech errors (McCormick, O’Neill & Siskin)\|McCormick et al]] invite ESL students to detect of errors in recordings of their speech, and activity formerly done only by teachers. [[Booth\|Booth et al.]] showed students some instructor-authored errors, and had them explain why the errors were wrong.

	~~The manipulation may compare student correction or explanation of an explicit identified error (see~~ [[~~Booth~~]] study		In the[[Student_Uncertainty\|Forbes-Riley & Litman]] study, if students give a correct response but the intonation contour of their spoken response indicates uncertainty, then the tutoring system gives them the same remediation (a subdialogue) as it would if the response were incorrect. Although this manipulation is perhaps not a close fit to the method of prompting error repair, it does invite students to treat their uncertainty as an error and to "repair" it.

	~~The manipulation may compare reinterpreting a correct response as a lucky guess and asking for help--this can be done by either the student or another agent~~ (~~see [[Student_Uncertainty\|Forbes-Riley & Litman]] study~~).		* Reif, F., & Scott, L. A. (1999). Teaching scientific thinking skills: Students and computers coaching each other. ''American Journal of Physics, 67''(9), 819-831.

	~~Dawn~~: ~~add examples e~~.g.~~, noun verb disagreement~~

	[[Category:Glossary]]		[[Category:Glossary]]
	[[Category:Independent Variables]]		[[Category:Independent Variables]]
	[[Category:PSLC General]]		[[Category:PSLC General]]

Bobhaus at 17:13, 23 May 2007

2007-05-23T17:13:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:13, 23 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Error correction support refers to~~ an [[instructional method~~]] that aids~~ students ~~in learning from~~ errors ~~or from incorrect behavior~~. ~~Specific kinds of error correction~~ support ~~include [[corrective self-explanation]] (see [[Booth]] study), encouraging student self-correction (see [[The self-~~correction of ~~speech~~ errors ~~(McCormick~~, ~~O’Neill & Siskin)\|McCormick et al]] study)~~, ~~and adapting instruction to [[student uncertainty]] (see [[Student_Uncertainty\|Forbes-Riley & Litman]] study)~~.		Prompting error repair is an instructional method where students are invited to detect and/or correct errors (Reif & Scott; Essay errors...) support is an instructional variable that compares detection and/or correction of errors by the student versus by another agent, e.g., a tutoring system or teacher.

			The manipulation may compare student detection of errors to other-agent detection (see [[The self-correction of speech errors (McCormick, O’Neill & Siskin)\|McCormick et al]] study).

			The manipulation may compare student correction or explanation of an explicit identified error (see [[Booth]] study

			The manipulation may compare reinterpreting a correct response as a lucky guess and asking for help--this can be done by either the student or another agent (see [[Student_Uncertainty\|Forbes-Riley & Litman]] study).

			Dawn: add examples e.g., noun verb disagreement

	[[Category:Glossary]]		[[Category:Glossary]]
	[[Category:Independent Variables]]		[[Category:Independent Variables]]
	[[Category:PSLC General]]		[[Category:PSLC General]]

Koedinger at 12:23, 18 April 2007

2007-04-18T12:23:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:23, 18 April 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Error correction support refers to an [[instructional method]] that aids students in learning from errors or from incorrect behavior. Specific kinds of error correction support include [[corrective self-explanation]] (see [[Booth]] study) and adapting instruction to [[student uncertainty]] (see [[Student_Uncertainty\|Forbes-Riley & Litman]] study).		Error correction support refers to an [[instructional method]] that aids students in learning from errors or from incorrect behavior. Specific kinds of error correction support include [[corrective self-explanation]] (see [[Booth]] study), encouraging student self-correction (see [[The self-correction of speech errors (McCormick, O’Neill & Siskin)\|McCormick et al]] study), and adapting instruction to [[student uncertainty]] (see [[Student_Uncertainty\|Forbes-Riley & Litman]] study).

Koedinger at 11:40, 18 April 2007

2007-04-18T11:40:18Z

New page

Error correction support refers to an [[instructional method]] that aids students in learning from errors or from incorrect behavior. Specific kinds of error correction support include [[corrective self-explanation]] (see [[Booth]] study) and adapting instruction to [[student uncertainty]] (see [[Student_Uncertainty|Forbes-Riley & Litman]] study).

[[Category:Glossary]]
[[Category:Independent Variables]]
[[Category:PSLC General]]